Z6 Kosevo
: ons jul 25, 2018 13:45
Hej
Der har i DXnews været bragt dette:
Z6 Prefix: A More Accurate Characterization
By N7NG, Wayne A. Mills
______________________________________________________________________
The ARRL recently reported that the ITU Secretary General, Houlin
Zhou, stated "the ITU has not allocated call sign series Z6 to any of
its member states." http://www.arrl.org/news/assigning-kosovo-z6-call-
signs-unauthorized-and-illegal-itu-secretary-general-says
"Consequently, the utilization of call signs series Z6 by any entity
without a formal allocation and consent of the ITU represents an
unauthorized and illegal usage of this international numbering
resource." - Houlin Zhou
A highly professional legal opinion states that "Kosovo is not an ITU
member state and is therefore not eligible to receive a call sign
block allocation from the ITU. [The Kosovo] administration has been
blocked from joining the ITU and becoming a party to the Radio
Regulations. Therefore the characterization of [the] use of the radio
callsign prefix Z6 to identify [radio transmissions in Kosovo] as
"illegal" is without foundation in international law. At this time the
Republic of Kosovo is not a signatory to the [ITU] treaty, although it
would be so if objections by others were removed".
Another opinion can be found at
http://www.amateurradio.eu/2018/06/25/i ... cal-arena/
There is little that I can - or should - add to the above. In
attempting to find a useful characterization for Kosovo's fit into the
DXCC program I looked at sovereignty. In fact, I did considerable
research on the topic. Sovereignty is difficult to define. As one
ITU/Amateur Radio expert put it: The concept of sovereignty is
"squishy". Simply put, it is difficult to define.
There are several generally accepted criteria for sovereignty, but
IMO, they are all somewhat vague, and not universally accepted. The
ARRL, recognizing this, chose to rely on a third party - The United
States Department of State - to simplify matters. For a number of
reasons - and IMO - this solution is more than adequate for ARRL's
purposes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Z6 prefix er ikke tildelt af ITU ?
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/terrestria ... eries.aspx
Der er jo andre prefix der heller ikke er man er godkendt af ARRL DXCC
1S Sprately !
73 Boye
Der har i DXnews været bragt dette:
Z6 Prefix: A More Accurate Characterization
By N7NG, Wayne A. Mills
______________________________________________________________________
The ARRL recently reported that the ITU Secretary General, Houlin
Zhou, stated "the ITU has not allocated call sign series Z6 to any of
its member states." http://www.arrl.org/news/assigning-kosovo-z6-call-
signs-unauthorized-and-illegal-itu-secretary-general-says
"Consequently, the utilization of call signs series Z6 by any entity
without a formal allocation and consent of the ITU represents an
unauthorized and illegal usage of this international numbering
resource." - Houlin Zhou
A highly professional legal opinion states that "Kosovo is not an ITU
member state and is therefore not eligible to receive a call sign
block allocation from the ITU. [The Kosovo] administration has been
blocked from joining the ITU and becoming a party to the Radio
Regulations. Therefore the characterization of [the] use of the radio
callsign prefix Z6 to identify [radio transmissions in Kosovo] as
"illegal" is without foundation in international law. At this time the
Republic of Kosovo is not a signatory to the [ITU] treaty, although it
would be so if objections by others were removed".
Another opinion can be found at
http://www.amateurradio.eu/2018/06/25/i ... cal-arena/
There is little that I can - or should - add to the above. In
attempting to find a useful characterization for Kosovo's fit into the
DXCC program I looked at sovereignty. In fact, I did considerable
research on the topic. Sovereignty is difficult to define. As one
ITU/Amateur Radio expert put it: The concept of sovereignty is
"squishy". Simply put, it is difficult to define.
There are several generally accepted criteria for sovereignty, but
IMO, they are all somewhat vague, and not universally accepted. The
ARRL, recognizing this, chose to rely on a third party - The United
States Department of State - to simplify matters. For a number of
reasons - and IMO - this solution is more than adequate for ARRL's
purposes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Z6 prefix er ikke tildelt af ITU ?
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/terrestria ... eries.aspx
Der er jo andre prefix der heller ikke er man er godkendt af ARRL DXCC
1S Sprately !
73 Boye